Policy Reflections in the Rarefied
Ambience of Erudite & Jurisdictive Milieu
Public Lecture - RL Vol XI No XIII, CXXIII,
MMXVII
Costantinos Berhutesfa
Costantinos, PhD
Professor of Public Policy, School of Graduate Studies,
College of Business and
Economics, AAU
Abstract
Habermas differentiates three primary generic cognitive areas in which human interest generates and interprets knowledge
- termed knowledge constitutive, determining
the mode of discovering knowledge as well
as whether knowledge claims can be
warranted. These areas define cognitive
interests (learning domains)
grounded in unique aspects of social
existence -- work, interaction and power.
Much of the historical-hermeneutic disciplines belong to the domain of the practical, while the emancipatory domain identifies self-knowledge or self-reflection - interest
in the way one sees oneself, one’s roles and social expectations.
On the other hand, the 21st century will be dominated
by algorithms, arguably
the single most important concept in our world. Natural algorithms have
ruled every century with life in it since Darwin
discovered the fundamental algorithm
of evolution. Out of that dumb process-logic, arises all the intelligence
and complexity of all living systems. Algorithmic
forces exist and exert their powers in systemic and relational ways; they are
not driven by isolatable and intrinsic traits. They require sequential steps,
built from iterative if-then-else logic, driven by richer information
processes than physical forces. Closely associated with this is the Singularity,
an era in which intelligence will become increasingly
non-biological and trillions of times more powerful than it is today. It
heralds the dawning of a new civilization that will enable people to transcend biological limitations amplifying their
creativity. It emerges from Artificial Intelligence that denotes electronic, digital, virtual or
other non-biological and/or disembodied entities, which exhibit the function of
intelligence.
Machine-learning
systems excel at prediction and governments have much to gain from applying
algorithms to public policy, but controversies loom. (The Economist, 2016). Nevertheless, what does such critical thinking, singularity, algorithmic
forces & artificial
intelligence have to do with public policy - a legal, ethical & moral
dispensation by the executive branch of government, but emerging from constitutional, legislative and administrative laws, vis-à-vis a class
of issues in a manner consistent with institutional customs?
Key words: critical thinking, public policy, algorithm,
singularity, artificial intelligence
See lecture here or
https://www.academia.edu/35490358/Artificial_Intelligence_Heralds_Titanic_Prospects_for_Humankind_-_Public_Policy_Trajectories_Financing_Developing_and_Regulating_Artificial_Intelligence_to_ensure_Public_Safety_in_a_Terror-Ridden_World_RL_Vol_XI_No_CCCX_MMXVII
No comments:
Post a Comment