Priming Public Policy to
Combat Entrepreneurial Stasis in Ethiopia
Public Lecture - RL Vol XII No
317 MMXVIII
Costantinos
Berhutesfa Costantinos, PhD
Professor of Public Policy & Sustainable
Institutional Reforms
Abstract
Entrepreneurship and business development in
a post-war/ post-command economy and under political transitions can be explained
with reference to two institutional factors: institutions and policies that
inform and influence the promotion of entrepreneurship & employment. The
central hypothesis is that the relative strength of entrepreneurship,
entrepreneurs and business organisations determines the wellbeing of the
economy. They require a plural set of social and political institutions of
which economic changes, downsizing government and privatisation of state owned
enterprises which promote and protect rules of peaceful participation and
completion in the market place.
Public policy intervention in the informal sector is argued based on
some mix of equity, efficiency or political economy principles. Whatever, the
basis of the argument might be there is a need for government policy
intervention to promote economic growth and reduce pervasive poverty in an
economy. Indeed, the socialist regime, which followed a centrally planned
economic system since 1974, introduced excessive interventions and controls.
After 1991, several policies were formulated and regulations promulgated
relating to diverse social, economic and political issues that are hardly
supportive of private sector development.
Hence, the ingredients of enabling environment for entrepreneurship
development are avoidance of bureaucratic barriers, efficient and reliable
infrastructure, expansion and/or establishment of financial institutions,
establishment of training institutions and a healthy business-government
relationship based on a stable political and regulatory climate. Grassroots
businesses (small scale businesses) constitute the building blocks of
entrepreneurial development anywhere in the world challenges that deserve
urgent attention in developing entrepreneurial capabilities and the small scale
sector in particular. These are lack of appropriate training system, lack of
information and advisory service, financial constraints, lack of properly
defined national policy, and that government institutions have been created to
serve only the large businesses. Hence the state must focus on expansion of the
role of civic associations sound and stable macroeconomic policy framework and
develop programme support objectives, outputs & benchmarks to provide
an enabling environment for the development and growth MSMEs, access to credit
& finance, facilitation of access to other essential services needed by
MSMEs, strengthen capacity of intermediary MSME support institutions,
membership associations and advocacy groups to deliver quality services. The
programme support to the overall programme is nationally executed within the
framework of a partnership between public and entrepreneurial sector, reflected
in the managerial and institutional arrangements.
Key
words: entrepreneurship, employment, MSME, business
organisations, public policy, partnershipSee lecture here or https://www.academia.edu/37686919/Priming_Public_Policy_to_Combat_Entrepreneurial_Stasis_in_Ethiopia_RL_Vol_XII_No_317_MMXVIII.pdf