Prof Levine’s submission on Ethiopia in 2006: Call for a New Direction underpins several points.
The May 15, 2005 election marked a
dramatic step forward on the road towards a democratic society. The populace deserves
credit for that unprecedented triumph. All concerned should pause, breathe
deeply and savor that historic achievement. (2) Reversing this (Ethiopian) conflict could mark an extraordinary step
forward for Ethiopia and enable it to return to a position of leadership in
Africa, much as did the resolution of apartheid in South Africa. The post-election disputes and related violence
had deprived the country from enjoying the fruits of that achievement. One
cannot agree more.
One needs to articulate responses and find answers to
these issues that arise out of the grueling impasse that citizens were dearly
paying for. Does political contestation enter electoral processes in Ethiopia
as an external ideology, constructing and deploying its concepts in sterile
abstraction from the immediacies of indigenous traditions, beliefs and values?
Furthermore do ideas of political competition come into play in total
opposition to, or in cooperation with historic Ethiopian values and sentiments?
As Prof Levin submits, political disputes are currently being addressed
through legal procedures. Whatever the outcome of those court proceedings, the
more deep-lying issues that led to those volatile disputes need to be addressed
if the country is to regain confidence and move forward with a vision of future
possibilities. Hence, he asked if we could look to shimgilena (mediation) that recurrently augurs on voluntary
problem-solving and conflict management practices that have endured to this day
in Ethiopia’s two millennia history -- where the method is most often employed in
which parties meet face to face to reach mutually acceptable resolutions.
This also brings to light some axioms of dispute resolution approaches
that derive from several basic premises about the nature of conflict, change
and power. Engagement often serves as an important impetus for positive change.
This is in line with Prof. Levin’s statement that the political parties argue eloquently on behalf of upholding the
rule of law. Therefore an important premise that successful conflict
management relies is on the participation of all legitimate parties. As Prof.
Levine has articulated very well
“Despite the upsurge of ethnic
politics in the past generation, it is abundantly clear that the bonds of Etyopiyawinet are alive and well.
Indeed, they may in many quarters be stronger than ever. I salute the people of
Ethiopia for maintaining those bonds and for carrying on with their traditional
attachment to justice, their cheerfulness in adversity, and their determination
to carry on. I say with all my heart: Idme
le-hulatchu, idme le-Etyopiya!!”
Indeed, Prof. Levine
was a man in search of the unfathomable Ethiopian society vividly demonstrated
by his acumen to pen the words in Greater
Ethiopia and Wax and Gold among
his numerous scripts (The Continuing Challenge of Weber's Theory of
Rational Action, Economy and Society; Powers of the Mind: The Reinvention of
Liberal Learning in America; Social Theory as a Vocation: Genres of Theory Work
in Sociology to name a few). He was unapologetic about his own craving
for consented-to political magnum opus
in this great nation; despising the idiom that political flavor was a precept
and discerning social finery from filthy power mongering, were despondently
naïve.
Rest in Peace
No comments:
Post a Comment